So, in my last VP debate post, Dave Watson commented wondering how you could call either candidate the winner, when people's perceptions of who won differ by party affiliation. Which is not precisely correct.
Educated, informed Republican pundits and party higher-ups are not pretending McPalin is kicking ass and taking names. Why? Simple: Because they aren't kicking ass. However, Fox News viewers and their ilk are madly in love with the empty-headed hockey mom and her geriatric warmonger sidekick, and have indeed been proclaiming her debate victory loudly across the interwebs in spite of the reality of the situation.
How is it possible that CNN, MSNBC and NPR viewers/listeners and most non-Fox media pundits called the debate squarely in Biden's favor, and yet Fox viewers and commentators are proclaiming Manchurian Barbie's victory? Simple: Fox viewers are fucking ignorant, and Fox commentators are fucking liars.
No, really. It's true.
Think of it this way: Fox viewers support George Bush, and think Bill O'Reilly actually has something worthwhile to say. What do BushCo and the O'Reilly clan have in common? How about willful denial of any verifiable facts that don't agree with what they want to believe, for starters? Or how about an unstoppable dedication to persist in repeating untruths as "facts" even after they've been disproven? Doesn't that sound just a teeny bit like what Palin did in the debate, when she fully ignored almost every single question the moderator asked, and instead cheerfully parroted all the innuendo and untruth she'd been coached to recite?
I could go on, but someone else already beat me to it:
While looking for relevant statistical differences between Fox Newsies and followers of other news outlets, I found an interesting piece summarizing a 2003 Program on International Policy Attitudes survey: Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War. Granted, the poll was taken five years ago, but I've seen recent polls suggesting that a shocking number of Americans still hold the misperceptions addressed in this survey … and I've seen no evidence of Fox News making any great movement toward greater factual accuracy in their broadcasts … so I'm perfectly willing to assert that all of the conclusions outlined below are still correct in essence, if not in their exact numbers.
The survey asked the following questions, noting which news outlet the respondents gave as their primary source of world information:
- Is it your impression that the US has or has not found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization?
- Since the war with Iraq ended*, is it your impression that the US has or has not found Iraqi weapons of mass destruction?
- Thinking about how all the people in the world feel about the US having gone to war with Iraq, do you think the majority of people favor the US having gone to war?
*Quaint, isn't it? The pollsters actually thought that whole "Mission Accomplished" speech meant the war in Iraq was actually over.
The answers, by the way, are "no clear evidence has been found," "no weapons of mass destruction have been found," and "the majority of people in the world do not favor the US having gone to war." If you got at least one wrong don't feel too bad: only 30% of people surveyed in three polls (June, July, and August-September) got all three correct.
[continued …]